Print is Dead! Or so <a href="http://www.davidcarsondesign.com/">David Carson</a> thought in his book of the same title. These days you can't go without reading content on-screen. The challenge to e-Learning developers and in e-learning content development is to make that text look as comfortable to read as printed text. In his article "The Fine Art of Font Choices", Mark Daoust
presents his research on the best fonts to use for web content and some other topics of consideration.
The key issue is readability and Daoust makes the case for font size, line-height, and line length. Making text enormous doesn't always make it readable. The same maxims that apply to newspaper design apply to the web. Make the line length comfortable to be read quickly and easily. Set the line-height (or leading) to allow the eye to freely move from one line to the next. Set the font size of the main text to a standard size and then offset the headings in appropriate increments from that.
In terms of font choice, research by Daoust indicates that sources are all over the board when it comes to font choice, narrowing the two main choices as Arial and Verdana. Curiously, Times New Roman, which offers serifs for easier reading, was viewed by readers as "unformatted." Georgia factored in as an alternative serif font that's easy to read.
Verdana was regarded by many to be the most readable font however, Verdana has a shorter x-height than Arial and therefore, Daoust concludes that Arial reigns supreme, at least for now. As far as line-lenght, a 70 character line length is more suitable for most reading and 120% is recommended for line-height. Refer to the following examples and make up your own mind!
Arial
At 120% line-height and 70 characters in lenght
Verdana
At 120% line-height and 70 characters in lenght
Al Lemieux
Senior e-Learning Developer
SyberWorks



