With all the discussion going on in the e-Learning analyst community about web 2.0 and the potential for learner generated content just because they want to or , i.e. its a natural, but not "forced" process of their learning........ I recently saw a post on Boston.com blog about a report put out by Hitwise that makes you really stand back and think long and hard about the e-Learning Pundits desire correlate the trend of user developed content to learner developed content......
Post Title: We're Mostly Voyers....
"With all the chatter about Web 2.0 and social media, you'd think everyone was creating things. Not so. Bill Tancer,
an analyst with HitWise says only 0.16 percent of visits to YouTube are
by users uploading video for others to watch. And only 0.20 percent of
visits to Flickr are to upload new photos. This is even smaller than the 1 percent rule
which says that for every 100 people online, one will create content,
10 will "interact" with it (commenting or offering improvements) and
the other 89 will just view it. But with so many people on the
Internet, even slim percentages yield a lot of content.
Related:
The 1% Rule"
I am not saying that I know the answer here or that it can not or should not work. Going on the above, if most people are "voyers" how does that not translate to e-Learning, even with interactive funky cool simulations developed in multimedia.
I have said on this blog that what many e-Learning Pundits are talking about is different from what is really going on, and the challenges faced by a corporate training department . i.e. people going through a training course offered by their corporation. They are doing it for some desired outcome, a certification, advancement, proficency on a skill.
I am sure this sounds cynical, and maybe out of fashion with the e-Learning Pundits, but it seems to me that learners will more than likely develop their own content because they are required to out of necessity, i.e., as a requirement to pass the course, or the process of trying to understand something, so they master a skill that puts them in line for a promotion. They may use a threaded discussion answer a question, or create some multimedia rubric in an effort to solve a problem, but not because its "natural" or "they desire to do it" .
Now, I am not trying to get all of the e-Learning Analysts up in arms, but just think, if you follow the logic from the post above, it would only be really 1% of your learners who may be predisposed to do this kind of Web 2.0 thing, so why would you then develop a certification type course completely on these techniques...
Again, I am not sure what the answer is here, but it does make you really think about some of the discourse and logic being used under the guise of Web 2.0 applied to e-Learning.....
Dave Boggs
SyberWorks, Inc.
SyberWorks e-Learning Podcast Series
SyberWorks LMS e-Learning Implementation Podcast Series 
SyberWorks Training Center Learning Management System